STRATIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Giving AI a trustworthy understanding of the physical world.

We research the deterministic geometry, physical representations, and evidence-aware reasoning required for AI to understand engineered objects—not merely describe their appearance.

Physical

objects and space

Geometric

measured evidence

Reasoned

facts and context

Actionable

guided systems

RESEARCH CORE

Physical
Intelligence

GEOMETRY

measured

RELATIONSHIPS

structured

REASONING

evidence-aware

ACTION

guided

TRACEABLE EVIDENCE

OUR RESEARCH THESIS

Language can describe the world. Physical intelligence must model it.

A language model can explain what a beam is. A physically intelligent system must determine which beam exists, where it is located, how it is oriented, what features it contains, what it connects to, and which conclusions are supported by evidence.

That requires more than fluent output. It requires a structured representation of geometry, relationships, constraints, uncertainty, and physical context that reasoning systems can query without inventing the substrate beneath them.

OBJECTS

Know what exists

Identify engineered entities, features, coordinate frames, and physical observations.

RELATIONSHIPS

Know how it fits together

Represent assembly structure, adjacency, support, connection, orientation, and hierarchy.

REASONING

Know what the evidence permits

Use deterministic facts and explicit constraints to guide explanation, planning, and action.

ACTIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMS

Four connected areas. One physical intelligence stack.

The programs below progress from measurable geometry to structured relationships, evidence-aware reasoning, and carefully supervised physical action.

01ACTIVE RESEARCH

Physical Intelligence

How can AI build a trustworthy understanding of engineered and physical systems?

We are researching representations that allow AI to identify physical entities, understand where they are, and reason about how assemblies, structures, and machines relate.

CURRENT FOCUS

Engineered-object identity
Spatial and assembly relationships
Physical-world grounding
02ACTIVE RESEARCH

Deterministic Geometry

How should geometry become structured, queryable knowledge rather than an opaque visual signal?

GeometryLab investigates measurable geometric entities, canonical frames, features, transforms, and structural fingerprints that preserve the evidence behind every result.

CURRENT FOCUS

Canonical coordinate systems
Feature and entity extraction
Traceable geometric evidence
03ACTIVE RESEARCH

Engineering Reasoning

How can AI reason from geometric facts without replacing engineering evidence with confident guesses?

We combine deterministic outputs, technical constraints, model reasoning, and human review so explanations and recommendations remain connected to their physical basis.

CURRENT FOCUS

Evidence-constrained inference
Explainable engineering checks
Tool-using reasoning systems
04ACTIVE RESEARCH

Industrial Autonomy

How can physical systems move from recognition to safe, supervised action?

Our long-term work connects geometry, vision, reasoning, and feedback into systems that can inspect, guide, verify, and eventually coordinate physical operations.

CURRENT FOCUS

Observe–compute–verify loops
Inspection and guided action
Human-supervised autonomy
PRIMARY RESEARCH PLATFORM

GeometryLab turns geometry into physical knowledge.

GeometryLab is the experimental platform where Stratic Systems tests how CAD and engineering geometry can become a deterministic, queryable representation of the physical world.

Rather than treating an engineered object as only a mesh, image, or filename, GeometryLab extracts measurable entities, features, frames, transforms, and relationships while retaining the source evidence used to establish them.

STRUCTURED OBSERVATION

entity-occurrence / verified

EVIDENCE RETAINED
ENTITY
structural_member
FRAME
canonical / local
AXIS
finite member axis
FEATURES
holes · slots · copes
RELATIONS
connected_to · supported_by
SOURCE
geometry reference retained

MEASURE

exact

RELATE

explicit

EXPLAIN

traceable

SERA

Reasoning over physical evidence.

SERA—the Stratic Engine for Reasoned Autonomy—is the reasoning and orchestration layer. GeometryLab establishes physical facts; SERA uses those facts with language models, vision, tools, constraints, and goals.

The research question is not simply whether a model can produce an answer. It is whether the answer can remain connected to observable evidence, expose uncertainty, and support an appropriate human or physical response.

EVIDENCE-AWARE REASONING LOOP

01

Establish facts

GeometryLab returns measured entities and relationships.

02

Interpret context

SERA combines goals, constraints, tools, and available knowledge.

03

Expose uncertainty

Unsupported conclusions remain distinguishable from verified evidence.

04

Coordinate response

The system explains, requests review, guides inspection, or proposes action.

RESEARCH ARCHITECTURE

From observation to reasoned action.

Each layer adds capability without hiding the evidence produced by the layer beneath it.

01

Observe

CAD, images, scans, machines

02

Structure

entities, frames, features

03

Relate

assemblies, connections, context

04

Reason

evidence, constraints, goals

05

Act

explain, guide, inspect, control

RESEARCH PRINCIPLES

Trust must be designed into the system.

Physical intelligence becomes useful only when people can understand where its conclusions came from, what remains uncertain, and who retains authority.

01

Deterministic first

Measure and structure what can be established directly before asking a model to infer what remains uncertain.

02

Evidence stays attached

Results should preserve their source geometry, transforms, relationships, and assumptions so they can be inspected.

03

AI adds reasoning

Models are most valuable when they explain, compare, plan, and coordinate over a reliable physical substrate.

04

Local-first where practical

Engineering files, observations, and organizational knowledge should remain under the owner’s control whenever possible.

05

Human authority remains

Consequential engineering and physical actions require visible evidence, review, and clearly defined responsibility.

PUBLISHED RESEARCH

Research notes on engineering intelligence and the physical world.

These papers document the working thesis behind Stratic Systems: deterministic engineering evidence beneath AI reasoning, explicit provenance, and a disciplined progression from understanding to action.

018 min read

PHYSICAL INTELLIGENCE

Physical Intelligence: Moving AI from Describing Objects to Understanding Them

A Stratic Systems research perspective on the representations AI needs to move from fluent descriptions of engineered objects to traceable understanding of physical systems.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026
029 min read

DETERMINISTIC GEOMETRY

Why Industrial AI Needs a Deterministic Geometry Layer

Why industrial AI systems benefit from separating measurable geometric facts from probabilistic interpretation and language-model reasoning.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026
039 min read

KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION

Capturing Engineering Knowledge Before It Disappears

A practical framework for preserving engineering knowledge that lives in people, geometry, drawings, decisions, and manufacturing practice before organizations are forced to rediscover it.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026
049 min read

CAD INTELLIGENCE

From CAD Files to Queryable Engineering Intelligence

A research architecture for turning CAD from a passive file opened by one application into a structured, traceable source of engineering knowledge that software and AI systems can query.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026
059 min read

ENGINEERING REASONING

Trustworthy AI for Manufacturing Requires More Than a Language Model

Why industrial AI systems need evidence separation, explicit uncertainty, human authority, deterministic tools, security, and evaluation around the language model itself.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026
068 min read

PHYSICAL SYSTEMS

Connecting CAD, Field Vision, and Physical Systems Through STX

A Stratic Systems research proposal for using STX as a portable engineering context package between CAD-derived physical knowledge and field vision systems.

Jeffery C. Wheat · Aug 6, 2026

PUBLIC RESEARCH · PROTECTED ENGINEERING

Share the direction. Protect the evidence and implementation.

Stratic Systems intends to share research questions, high-level methods, selected technical findings, and validated demonstrations when they can be released responsibly.

Customer information, private engineering data, proprietary datasets, and production implementation details remain protected.

PUBLIC

Research direction

High-level architecture

Selected validated results

Responsible demonstrations

PROTECTED

Customer and partner data

Private engineering assets

Proprietary datasets

Production implementation

THE NEXT AI FOUNDATION

Physical intelligence will not emerge from language alone.

It requires geometry, relationships, evidence, reasoning, and a disciplined path from understanding to action. That is the foundation Stratic Systems is building.